Can Justin Crawford Get off the Ground, and Stay off the Ground?

I’m of the opinion that you usually don’t learn much from watching spring training. It’s glorified practice, with inconsistent quality of competition even...
HomeChessHuman and AI choices | ChessBase

Human and AI choices | ChessBase


The question we asked our readers was: Who are the most intersting chess players in history, focusing on style, rather than just strength? Who do you count as your favourites? We listed a number of candidates: Paul Morphy, Wilhelm Steinitz, Emanuel Lasker, José Raúl Capablanca, Alexander Alekhine, Mikhail Botvinnik, Mikhail Tal, Bobby Fischer, Anatoly Karpov, Garry Kasparov, Vladimir Kramnik, Viswanathan Anand, Magnus Carlsen, Hikaru Nakamura, Fabiano Caruana, Gukesh Dommaraju, R Praggnanandhaa, Arjun Erigaisi, Alireza Firouzja.

This is the list we got from the feedback of our readers:

01. Fischer
02. Carlsen
03. Kasparov
04. Aljechine
05. Karpov
06. Tal
07. Capablanca
08. Keres
09. Spassky
10. Polgar
11. Smyslov
12. Rubinstein
13. Petrosian
14. Morphy
15. Lasker
16. Kramnik
17. Korchnoi
18. Botvinnik
19. Topalov
20. Shirov
21. Anderssen
22. Anand
23. Steinitz
24. Bronstein
25. Timman
26. Nezhmetdinov
27. Ivanchuk
28. Casablanca
29. Zukertort
30. Vachier-Lagrave
31. Tartakower
32. Svidler
33. Rapport
34. Planinc
35. Niemann
36. Miles
37. Lasker
38. Hou Yifan
39. Geller
40. Firouzja
41. Euwe
42. Chigorin
43. Boleslavsky
44. Bohatirchuk

How does that compare with what AI thinks?

Ed Schröder, the Dutch software developer, used his program Best of Chess, which we described in an earlier report, to extract the most spectacular games from chess history, evaluating them by three features:

  • King Attack
  • Material Sacrifice
  • Length of the game (the smaller the number of moves in a game the higher the bonus).

Ed ran his algorithms on the many million of high-quality games contained in Mega Database, and it identified the players it considered most attractive. This is the top 50 list generated by Best of Chess:  

01. Morphy
02. Nimzowitsch
03. Anderssen
04. Reti
05. Zukertort
06. Steinitz
07. Chigorin
08. Lasker
09. Alekhine
10. Euwe 
11. Tarrasch
12. Rubinstein
13. Tal
14. Fischer
15. Shirov
16. Spassky
17. Polgar
18. Capablanca
19. Kasparov
20. Wei 
21. Bronstein
22. Geller
23. Anand
24. Botvinnik
25. Van Foreest
26. Keres 
27. Erigaisi
28. Reshevsky
29. Kramnik
30. Petrosian
31. Aronian
32. Ding
33. Gukesh
34. Keymer
35. Carlsen
36. Kortschnoj
37. Svidler
38. Topalov
39. Niemann

40. Adams
41. Praggnanandhaa
42. Giri
43. Firouzja
44. Gelfand
45. So
46. Caruana
47. Smyslov
48. Karpov
49. Nakamura
50. Leko

Here’s a page that lists the results with all the individual factors that contributed to the final evaluation. Here’s an explanation on how Best of Chess conducts its evaluation. And here you can directly compare the rankings of both groups:

Humans

AI

01. Fischer

02. Carlsen

03. Kasparov

04. Aljechine

05. Karpov

06. Tal

07. Capablanca

08. Keres

09. Spassky

10. Polgar

11. Smyslov

12. Rubinstein

13. Petrosian

14. Morphy

15. Lasker

16. Kramnik

17. Korchnoi

18. Botvinnik

19. Topalov

20. Shirov

21. Anderssen

22. Anand

23. Steinitz

24. Bronstein

25. Timman

26. Nezhmetdinov

27. Ivanchuk

28. Casablanca

29. Zukertort

30. Vachier-Lagrave

31. Tartakower

32. Svidler

33. Rapport

34. Planinc

35. Niemann

36. Miles

37. Lasker

38. Hou Yifan

39. Geller

40. Firouzja

41. Euwe

42. Chigorin

43. Boleslavsky

44. Bohatirchuk

01. Morphy

02. Nimzowitsch

03. Anderssen

04. Reti

05. Zukertort

06. Steinitz

07. Chigorin

08. Lasker

09. Alekhine

10. Euwe 

11. Tarrasch

12. Rubinstein

13. Tal

14. Fischer

15. Shirov

16. Spassky

17. Polgar

18. Capablanca

19. Kasparov

20. Wei 

21. Bronstein

22. Geller

23. Anand

24. Botvinnik

25. Van Foreest

26. Keres

27. Erigaisi

28. Reshevsky

29. Kramnik

30. Petrosian

31. Aronian

32. Ding

33. Gukesh

34. Keymer

35. Carlsen

36. Kortschnoj

37. Svidler

38. Topalov

39. Niemann

40. Adams

41. Praggnanandhaa

42. Giri

43. Firouzja

44. Gelfand

Ed created a page with games of four top scorers. The values for each of the three criteria are quoted in the games, which you can replay it on the page. “BTW, the first Morphy game is hilarious, I did not know it,” Ed writes.

Finally, here’s an animation of a list, based solely on their ratings, that was independantly generated by Chess.com five years ago: